The Rise of Far-Right Political Forces as a Disruptive Geopolitical Weak Signal
Across Europe, subtle but significant shifts in political alignment reveal a weak signal that could become a major disruptive force over the next decade. The growing influence of far-right parties, often fueled by social unrest, economic strain, and geopolitical tensions, is reshaping traditional alliances, government spending priorities, and societal cohesion. This emerging trend could have profound implications beyond politics alone, reverberating through defence planning, international relations, business investment environments, and civil society.
What’s Changing?
Recent electoral forecasts and social surveys illustrate a gradual but steady rise in support for far-right political factions in key European countries, signaling a potential breaking point in post-Cold War political order. Poland’s parliamentary elections later in 2023, for instance, are expected to reflect whether far-right support has expanded further, especially among younger voters. This demographic shift may challenge assumptions about the electorate’s long-term political orientation and the resilience of liberal-democratic institutions (The Conversation).
Simultaneously, countries like Spain and France have seen far-right parties capitalize on domestic turmoil—whether from rioting, economic anxiety, or cultural fragmentation—to amplify their reach and influence. This convergence of social disorder and populist narrative-building is enabling these factions to penetrate mainstream politics more deeply than before (Eurasia Review).
Another major development lies in the defence spending landscape. Proposed increases in European defence budgets to 3.5% of GDP by 2030 require reallocating approximately €250 billion annually from social programs, which risks fueling far-right narratives centered on sacrifice, nationalism, and distrust of established governments. Italy and Sweden have already seen these tensions rise, illustrating how fiscal policy and security objectives can be leveraged in political messaging frameworks (FAF).
At the geopolitical level, Poland’s strategic significance is magnified due to its position in the EU and NATO, and because of France’s internal political fragility under a government relying on the support of the far-right National Rally party. This dynamic may complicate European power balances and cooperation on issues ranging from defence initiatives to responses to the Ukraine conflict (RFE/RL).
Why is this Important?
The rise in far-right support is not merely a political curiosity; it signals a potential shift in governance priorities, international alliances, and societal narratives—potentially altering the trajectory of European and global stability. Heightened nationalism and exclusionary political agendas could impede multilateral cooperation on defence, climate change, trade, and human rights, fragmenting existing coalitions at a time when unified responses to global challenges are critical.
Defence spending reallocation risks intensifying social divisions as far-right actors exploit the tension between security priorities and social welfare concerns. This trade-off challenges governments to maintain legitimacy and social trust while attempting to navigate escalating geopolitical risks. The erosion of trust in democratic institutions also endangers investor confidence, affecting economic stability and market predictability.
Poland’s potential political evolution serves as a bellwether for other countries, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, where far-right movements could reshape the EU’s internal cohesion from within. This evolution may undermine common foreign policy stances and weaken NATO’s unified posture, thus affecting European and transatlantic security architectures.
Implications
The aggregation of these weak signals suggests several critical implications for stakeholders across sectors:
- Governments may face increased difficulty balancing defence commitments with social spending demands, challenging policy coherence and social contracts.
- International alliances could experience realignments if far-right-supported governments prioritize unilateral or nationalist policies over collective action, complicating cooperation on security and economic fronts.
- Businesses and investors may confront volatile regulatory environments and shifting market conditions driven by nationalist policies, protectionist trade measures, and social unrest.
- Civil society risks deeper polarisation as far-right narratives emphasize identity politics and social exclusion, possibly elevating the risk of domestic unrest and weakening social cohesion.
Strategists and planners should monitor these evolving dynamics for early warning signals and develop adaptive strategies that account for growing political fragmentation and shifting societal values. This may include bolstering resilience in supply chains vulnerable to geopolitical disruption, engaging in scenario planning that incorporates more militant nationalist responses, and preparing for altered government partnership priorities in defence and social policy.
Questions
- How might increased defence spending fuel social unrest or political polarization, and what mechanisms exist to mitigate these effects?
- In what ways could the rise of far-right governments within the EU reshape collective foreign and economic policies over the next decade?
- What contingency plans should businesses adopt to navigate regulatory and market volatility tied to nationalist political shifts?
- How can international institutions balance the need for unity with respect for increasing nationalist sentiment among member states?
- What indicators should strategic intelligence functions prioritize to detect early accelerations in far-right influence across diverse regions?
Understanding this weak signal as an emerging trend allows policymakers, business leaders, and civil society to better anticipate and respond to the potentially disruptive consequences of far-right political ascendancy within Europe and beyond.
Keywords
far-right politics; European defence spending; political polarization; geopolitical realignment; populism; EU cohesion
Bibliography
- Ukraine war: What young Poles think about their nation’s role – Here’s what our survey shows. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/ukraine-war-what-young-poles-think-about-their-nations-role-heres-what-our-survey-shows-209927?#Echobox=1690904796
- Drugs, Crime and Terror: Welcome to the New World Disorder [Op-ed]. Eurasia Review. https://www.eurasiareview.com/25072023-drugs-crime-and-terror-welcome-to-the-new-world-disorder-oped/
- European Defense Autonomy and Its Implications for Global Power Dynamics: The Emergence of a More Autonomous European. FAF. https://www.faf.ae/home/2025/3/6/european-defense-autonomy-and-its-implications-for-global-power-dynamics-the-emergence-of-a-more-autonomous-european
- EU-NATO-Geopolitics-Ukraine 2025 Trump. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. https://www.rferl.org/a/eu-nato-geopolitics-ukraine-2025-trump/33215200.html
